共 6 篇文章
This article strongly questions and criticizes several policies and events during President Tsai Ing-wen's five years in office, including energy policy, the New Southbound Policy, returning Taiwanese businesses and real estate, Forward-looking Infrastructure, international status, ractopamine pork imports, lowering the voting age, and concerns about press freedom and judicial neutrality.
With a sharp satirical tone, this article questions the behavior of Taiwan independence advocates who travel to Mainland China to publicly criticize the CCP, only to cry 'unfair' when they are arrested according to local laws. By listing various international and religious taboos (such as the King of Thailand, North Korea, and Allah), the author highlights the absurdity of such 'trespassing' provocations, questioning whether this is a form of 'selective cheap justice' or an intentional act of bullying designed to create political incidents. The piece concludes by questioning whether the real goal is to save lives or simply to perform a political drama.
The article comments on the incident where anti-pension reform groups blocked athletes from entering the opening ceremony of the 2017 Taipei Summer Universiade. It criticizes the 'cheap justice' and hypocrisy of the internet community. The author argues that this incident was less severe than the Sunflower Movement's occupation of the Legislative Yuan and Executive Yuan years ago, questioning why those who shouted 'When dictatorship is a fact, revolution is a duty' now refuse to allow military, public, and teaching personnel to protest. The author accuses netizens of bullying these professionals out of resentment and incompetence, highlighting a double standard compared to their treatment of China Airlines flight attendants' strikes and ignoring more intense protests at major international events abroad.
This article harshly critiques the 'transitional justice' promoted by the DPP and independence advocates, labeling it as 'cheap justice' and rejecting any comparison to Germany's historical reckoning. The author argues that the scale of the 228 Incident differs vastly from the Holocaust and questions the identity of victims, suggesting many were Communist spies or pro-Japanese militants. It concludes that current legislative actions, such as the Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement, are unconstitutional acts of political theater.
This article severely criticizes the phenomenon where people use smartphones to secretly film others in public and upload the footage to the internet, labeling it as 'cheap justice' and 'perverted' behavior. The author notes that while the law doesn't prohibit filming non-private parts in public, secret filmer's lack basic respect for others and are merely seeking internet 'likes' to satisfy superficial desires. He argues that the real solution to a problem is to actually help or intervene, rather than standing by and recording, and emphasizes that this cold behavior of secret filming is a root cause of societal indifference.
This article harshly criticizes the 'seconds-to-refund' destruction of Lin Fengying's fresh milk, labeling it as 'cheap justice' and 'the ultimate degeneration of rural citizens' biological quality.' The author emphasizes that such actions waste food and trample on the lives of animals, accusing participants of exploiting the goodwill refund policies of supermarkets without contributing to meaningful protests.